The contents were in the first hour and a half more general. It distinguished itself from possibly a slight tendency to introduce a "fair use" arrangement, while at the same time emphasizes was that, contrary to the European regulations are.
Most questions were probably by reading the report or a current textbook on Copyright - done (eg, Schack> highly recommended and also with political overtones). If politicians do not do their homework, bring the whole circus nothing. Some experts advocate
a reconsideration of the exclusive rights in favor of stronger social bond or stronger societies. The moral rights issues are largely overlooked.
14:40 Now it's about the culture flatrate. My opinion: let the nonsense, more can not curtail the author's rights.
14:42 opening of quasi-monopolistic structures by recycling compulsory licenses? now should also be incorporated into the market regulatory policy Copyright Act? Write something but the GWB or regulates it right at the European level.
The first begin to doze. Actually, they are right. Here comes out with nothing.
The population issues have to do with the law (also) a little, but are more understanding on copyright issues.
The motto could be: experts who do not enter each other may ill-prepared politicians are trying to convey basic principles of copyright. The experiment should be evaluated as a failure. Even if the politicians would keep everything, they were hardly qualified to assess a bill.
Creative work is now something for idealists and romantics. The business to make a rule others.
0 comments:
Post a Comment