I am currently half-interest to Survival gonna wind sites, has made me wonder if I legally at all should make a fire to boil my drinking water (or cook meat or poached fish).
A fire I only really need if I will stay at least one night in the open. Therefore, the additional question if I could camp there.
The relevant law is the first National Forest Act (Federal Forest Act) . What we must always in the forest, lays § 14 .
(1) entry into the forest for the purpose of recreation is permitted. Cycling, driving with wheelchairs and riding in the forest is allowed only on roads and paths. Use at your own risk. This is particularly true for forest-typical hazards.
(2) The states regulate the details. You can enter the forest for good reason, especially of forest protection, forest or wildlife management, protection of forest visitors or to avoid serious damage or to protect other legitimate interests of the forest owner, restrict and other types of use in whole or in part, treat as they enter.
pursuant to paragraph 1 should I use with horse, bike and wheelchair, only the roads and paths. Driving a car I can always only on the roads, but then, when the times comes through the forest. In reverse, I may walk away but apparently also roam the roads. The details, however, regulate the states. They have to adopt national forest laws, which differ slightly.
I was interested in the Lower Saxony Forest Act, as this for its own survival would be significantly Tripp, if necessary. The § § 23-32 NWaldG regulate the admission, So what may be explicit, the § § 33-36 NWaldG the behavior, so certain limitations.
The forest is one gem. § 2 para 1 NWaldG the open countryside, the acc. § 23 are allowed to enter NWaldG principle by anyone. For the sleep in the forest is § 27 NWaldG relevant. It reads: . "In the open countryside outside not approved campsites the tents, setting up of caravans and mobile homes and stay in tents, campers and caravans allowed"
We are in the forest not in a campsite and a Caravan or an RV, we have also not there. Also we must not camp. When you stay at the forest raises the question of what camping is for the purposes of the Act. A tent may be set up not sure. should span a plane to be borderline. Since the law is not easy to sleep in the forest forbids but somewhere there must be a limit. If you only use natural materials or conditions or simply lays only one a sleeping bag on the floor, then this may not be only for excessively broad interpretation of the provision still regarded as tents. Presumably, the forester will be thrilled but still little in the forest over a sleeping man to stumble. Judgments on the issue I have unfortunately not known. According to § 28 NWaldG , the forest owners in individual cases and allow for a few days camping. In the private forest of a friend, so it's safest. But best accompanied by a written permit.
Assuming that I am traveling without a tent and that the authority does not mean also that it is prohibited in any case to stay in the woods, yet the question remains after the fire.
This is stipulated in § 35 para 1 NWaldG . "(1) In the forest, bog and heath in dangerous proximity as well as this, it is prohibited in the period from March 1 to 31 October to light the fire or smoke. This does not apply Forest ownership end, other property and persons, to those in a permanent stand service or employment relationship and do work for them on the land or labor, and for there to hunt officer. "
In the winter I may so, conversely make fire , during that period were not. Where the scheme is clear. If I make a fire, I must be careful, of course, § 35 NWaldG will furthermore include further details.
An exception is when I am forest owners, the rest is rather unlikely. Forest owners acc. § 4 NWaldG am I as an owner, or if I use and immediate Owner am. Such a one as I will, as a tenant. (-> Because written evidence in the woods) a sufficient agreement with the owner equal right to use in order to demonstrate direct co-ownership can Though I am not, but should. This should then make the fire outside the prescribed time allowed. Something designed for this solution to circumvent the limitations of the State Forest Law but I put my hand in fire. As one forest owner is also an obligation, such as application of the liability that will have to pass the contract again. Lawyer's advice is therefore recommended in an emergency.
contain the forest laws of other states similar arrangement, which one would look at individual cases in detail.
0 comments:
Post a Comment